On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 12:01:01PM -0400, Dave Reisner wrote: > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 04:54:34PM +0100, Thomas Bächler wrote: > > Am 25.03.2014 01:40, schrieb Lennart Poettering: > > >> This is just a kludge... Why is system.journal to be treated differently? > > >> It seems that the proper fix is to set the mode on the directory properly > > >> during installation. > > > > > > Precisely, packaging script are expected to properly chown and setfacl > > > the directory on install. From the .spec file in Fedora: > > > > This completely ignores the problem Dave mentions in his earlier post: > > Volatile journals are owned by root:root. > > I talked to Lennart about this last night on IRC -- we agreed that the > solution here is to introduce an 'M' action in the tmpfiles language > which is a recursive version of 'm'.
Cool, want me to code this up? thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
