On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 12:13:56PM -0400, Dave Reisner wrote: > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 09:09:57AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 12:01:01PM -0400, Dave Reisner wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 04:54:34PM +0100, Thomas Bächler wrote: > > > > Am 25.03.2014 01:40, schrieb Lennart Poettering: > > > > >> This is just a kludge... Why is system.journal to be treated > > > > >> differently? > > > > >> It seems that the proper fix is to set the mode on the directory > > > > >> properly > > > > >> during installation. > > > > > > > > > > Precisely, packaging script are expected to properly chown and setfacl > > > > > the directory on install. From the .spec file in Fedora: > > > > > > > > This completely ignores the problem Dave mentions in his earlier post: > > > > Volatile journals are owned by root:root. > > > > > > I talked to Lennart about this last night on IRC -- we agreed that the > > > solution here is to introduce an 'M' action in the tmpfiles language > > > which is a recursive version of 'm'. > > > > Cool, want me to code this up? > > Go right ahead!
Ok, I took a look at this today, at the systemd hackfest, and good news, I think it's already implemented! Look at the 'Z' option, it does the fixup of permissions in a recursive manner. For good measure, it also fixes up the security permissions, which is exactly what 'm' does as well. I'll go test it out, to be sure... thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
