On Fri, 08.08.14 17:00, [email protected] ([email protected]) wrote: > From: Harald Hoyer <[email protected]> > > According to Brent Baude <[email protected]>, who provided the patch, > IBM doesn't want to support the PPC 32 bit LE architecture at all.
What is "support" supposed to mean? Does that mean that the silicon for PPC32LE has and will never exist? Or does this mean that they are simply not interested in supporting Linux on ppc32le like this with support employees and stuff? I think if the silicon exists and people play around with it, we should keep the thing probably. However, if this is a theoretic architecture only, then let's kill it. > --- > src/shared/architecture.h | 5 ----- > 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/shared/architecture.h b/src/shared/architecture.h > index 71c79b1..2bbfb8a 100644 > --- a/src/shared/architecture.h > +++ b/src/shared/architecture.h > @@ -90,13 +90,8 @@ Architecture uname_architecture(void); > # define LIB_ARCH_TUPLE "powerpc64le-linux-gnu" > # endif > #elif defined(__powerpc__) > -# if __BYTE_ORDER == __BIG_ENDIAN > # define native_architecture() ARCHITECTURE_PPC > # define LIB_ARCH_TUPLE "powerpc-linux-gnu" > -# else > -# define native_architecture() ARCHITECTURE_PPC_LE > -# error "Missing LIB_ARCH_TUPLE for PPCLE" > -# endif > #elif defined(__ia64__) > # define native_architecture() ARCHITECTURE_IA64 > # define LIB_ARCH_TUPLE "ia64-linux-gnu" Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
