On 11/08/14 17:14, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mon, 11.08.14 15:57, Lennart Poettering ([email protected]) wrote: > >> On Fri, 08.08.14 17:00, [email protected] ([email protected]) wrote: >> >>> From: Harald Hoyer <[email protected]> >>> >>> According to Brent Baude <[email protected]>, who provided the patch, >>> IBM doesn't want to support the PPC 32 bit LE architecture at all. >> What is "support" supposed to mean? Does that mean that the silicon for >> PPC32LE has and will never exist? Or does this mean that they are simply >> not interested in supporting Linux on ppc32le like this with support >> employees and stuff? >> >> I think if the silicon exists and people play around with it, we should >> keep the thing probably. However, if this is a theoretic architecture >> only, then let's kill it. > Judging by this it's something that actually exists: > > http://lwn.net/Articles/408051/ > > Hence I think we should leave the arch in... > > Lennart >
Thanks. (As in, it's supported arch in Gentoo) _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
