On Mon, 11.08.14 15:57, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
> On Fri, 08.08.14 17:00, har...@redhat.com (har...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> > From: Harald Hoyer <har...@redhat.com>
> >
> > According to Brent Baude <bba...@redhat.com>, who provided the patch,
> > IBM doesn't want to support the PPC 32 bit LE architecture at all.
>
> What is "support" supposed to mean? Does that mean that the silicon for
> PPC32LE has and will never exist? Or does this mean that they are simply
> not interested in supporting Linux on ppc32le like this with support
> employees and stuff?
>
> I think if the silicon exists and people play around with it, we should
> keep the thing probably. However, if this is a theoretic architecture
> only, then let's kill it.
Judging by this it's something that actually exists:
http://lwn.net/Articles/408051/
Hence I think we should leave the arch in...
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering, Red Hat
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
