On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Lennart Poettering <lenn...@poettering.net>
wrote:

> On Fri, 23.10.15 00:59, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Am 23.10.2015 um 00:39 schrieb Ivan Shapovalov:
> > >On 2015-10-22 at 23:12 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> > >>[...]
> > >>and why not simply "timedatectl -H user@host[:port]" since host:port
> > >>is
> > >>a well known protocol agnostic way to specify a non-default port?
> > >
> > >Because the syntax of -H parameter is "[user@]host[:container]"
> > >and it does not allow specifying an explicit port number.
> >
> > [user@]host[:container][:port]
> > [user@]host[:port][:container]
> >
> > nothing unusual
>
> Nope. The idea is that
>
>       foo:bar:baz:waldo
>
> is kind of "path": connect to host "foo", enter its container "bar",
> and from there connect to "bar"'s container "baz" and then further
> down into "baz"'s container "waldo"... Containers are stackable after
> all.
>

The usual path separator would be "/" or "!", then?

Hopefully -H at least parses root@[2001:db8::1] correctly...

-- 
Mantas Mikulėnas <graw...@gmail.com>
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Reply via email to