26.09.2016 17:58, Xen пишет: > Andrei Borzenkov schreef op 26-09-2016 15:28: > >> What effect do you expect? If service Requires mount point and mount >> point is not available, service startup fails. That is correct and >> expected behavior. If service does not require mount point, service >> should be saying Wants and After. Which is at the end exactly what >> "nofail" does w.r.t. local-fs.target. > > Point is that many services are not exactly vital for system booting and > I don't know how long it takes to get a maintainance prompt, if at all.
Emergency service (if you mean that) is entered only if local-fs.target fails, at least as shipped by upstream. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel