26.09.2016 17:58, Xen пишет:
> Andrei Borzenkov schreef op 26-09-2016 15:28:
>> What effect do you expect? If service Requires mount point and mount
>> point is not available, service startup fails. That is correct and
>> expected behavior. If service does not require mount point, service
>> should be saying Wants and After. Which is at the end exactly what
>> "nofail" does w.r.t. local-fs.target.
> Point is that many services are not exactly vital for system booting and
> I don't know how long it takes to get a maintainance prompt, if at all.

Emergency service (if you mean that) is entered only if local-fs.target
fails, at least as shipped by upstream.
systemd-devel mailing list

Reply via email to