We are using Weston, we started Weston as service and added that dependency to hmi application.
Iam starting as user service. There is no reason for starting as basic.target. For testing purpose , iam using basic.target. I don't think so, it depends on any hardware. As of my understanding only Weston is enough. Iam getting error log related to hmi. "application initialization failed". On Wed, 29 Aug 2018, 8:13 pm Mantas Mikulėnas, <graw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Does your application report any errors after failed startup? > > How is the "touch feature" implemented? Does it depend on any services, > any hardware devices? > > Are you starting the application as a system service, or as a --user > service? > > Why are you using basic.target? > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 3:55 PM deepan muthusamy <deepan.m2...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> I have a hmi application(without touch feature enabled) created using >> cgi. If I start that application under basic.target, it's running >> successfully. >> >> But if I start that application( with touch enabled) under basic.target >> it is failing to start. >> Even systemctl --user start hmi.service also failing to start. >> Only difference between them is touch feature. >> Am I have to start any other service bedore for touch feature? >> _______________________________________________ >> systemd-devel mailing list >> systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel >> > > > -- > Mantas Mikulėnas >
_______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
