Am 02.01.19 um 22:09 schrieb James Feeney: > On 1/2/19 3:21 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> it's >> pretty obvious when i REQUIRE something that it should be there when i >> get started > > Not only is it not "obvious" that "something should be there", it is not true. > > You are confusing "Requires=" and "Requisite=". > > Some developers and some users are not native English speakers.
tell me what is opaque in case of the word require? or better tell me a common sense usecase where you require some other unit but don't care if it was started already and no you can't replace common sense with documentation justify weird behavior _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
