But the argument made in favor of the Africans is that you see better speed
at longer distances than in the rest of the world.  If you are a 50s guy
you'd better move up to the marathon because at 5 and 10k 48 and 49 second
guys are going to be there.  If you are a 48 or 49 second guy you might have
got out of the 1500 because of the 47 second guys.  The faster guys can do
just as much mileage and stamina training as the 52 second guys so it
still--in part--boils down to what guys who are naturally distance runners
have the most leg speed.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of edndana
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 11:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: t-and-f: 12:57 last 5000


> Perhaps our 10k guys (and 5k guys) go about training too much like they
> would for a marathon and don't focus enough on speed.  Geb constantly
talks
> about improving his speed.  How many of our 10k guys can run 24.5 flat out
> let alone at the end of a 10k?

Jeez, I'm sure at least 8 of our top 10 10K guys could run 24.5 all out, if
not all of them.  They may never actually have done so, but I bet nearly all
of them could.  Having watched Culpepper accelerate in distance races, I am
100% sure that he could run well under 24.  Personally, though, I don't
consider differences in all out speed to be a big factor in differentiating
people in the 10K.  Sure, if one guy can run 22 and another guy can run 25,
that will mean something, but Lydiard had it right  - the problem with
distances is not to get more speed but to get the stamina to hold the speed
for longer (both through LFD and targeted speedwork).  Think how many people
can run 53 secs for a 400m (thousands in the U.S. for certain) and how few
can hold it for 800m and make nationals.  The problem is not speed.

For years we gave Americans a hard time for not doing enough miles like the
Africans.  Now we're wondering if they aren't doing enough speed.  The fact
is that you have to do high mileage AND speedwork.  Some Americans do and
some don't.  But we're not getting beaten because the top Americans aren't
training well.  We're getting beaten for a whole myriad of reasons, some of
which we have control over and some of which we don't.  It's a tough
competitive world out there, and there are no easy answers such as adding
more speed.

- Ed Parrot




Reply via email to