Hi Aldas
Aldas Nabazas-2 wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Rene Rebe <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Aug 10, 2010, at 10:04 PM, luisbf wrote: >> >>> was made by editing pkgconfig's pkg.m4 and changing dnl to []dnl. >>> In any case, this patch is only applied at stage 5. If anyone does a >>> test >>> build, it would be great to know if this works ok with the patch being >>> applied at stage 0 and 1 as well. >>> http://old.nabble.com/file/p29401692/pkgconfig.diff pkgconfig.diff >> >> Hm, does not fail for me, so not yet applied, Aldas? > > Patch is fine but little bit concerned about implementation. Anyway, > I'd say we should revert autoconf back to 2.65 and save on pills from > headache. René? > 95% sure I will do this for 8.0 only I want to see how my clean build > goes. > >> > > This worries me a bit as well. I'm going to do a new build using autoconf > 2.65, i don't think i fancy the idea of patching m4 files regularly to > overcome whatever might've been broken in autoconf 2.66 or 2.67. > >>> With gobject-introspection, the issue is the following: at stage 5, >>> Cairo is >>> always built after gobject-introspection, with 127.500 priority, and >>> gobject-introspection with 126.030. >>> For some reason, the test included in the gobject-introspection.conf >>> fails >>> to append to $extraconfopt the --disable-tests switch which disables the >>> Cairo test. >>> THe change checks for stage level and appends --disable-tests, else uses >>> the >>> pkginstalled method. >>> http://old.nabble.com/file/p29401692/gobject-introspection.diff >>> gobject-introspection.diff >> >> I changed it to simply never run the tests, ... >> >>> GtkGLExt, is using deprecated macros (obsoleted in GTK 2.18, deprecated >>> in >>> 2.20), see: >>> http://osdir.com/ml/general/2010-03/msg21663.html >>> Patch fixes this by replacing the deprecated macros with the new >>> functions. >>> http://old.nabble.com/file/p29401692/gtkglext.diff gtkglext.diff >> >> Is there any failure caused by this? Looks like it builds here, so not >> yet applied. > > Would commit if compiles with patch, will save from hassle in the future. > > Thanks, > Aldas > > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to > [email protected] with a subject of: unsubscribe t2 > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Patches-fixes-for-9.0-trunk-tp29401692p29410139.html Sent from the T2 mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
----------------------------------------------------------- If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to [email protected] with a subject of: unsubscribe t2
