Hi, On Aug 11, 2010, at 5:17 PM, Aldas Nabazas wrote:
> Hey, > > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Rene Rebe <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Aug 11, 2010, at 2:39 PM, Aldas Nabazas wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Rene Rebe <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> On Aug 10, 2010, at 10:04 PM, luisbf wrote: >>>> >>>>> was made by editing pkgconfig's pkg.m4 and changing dnl to []dnl. >>>>> In any case, this patch is only applied at stage 5. If anyone does a test >>>>> build, it would be great to know if this works ok with the patch being >>>>> applied at stage 0 and 1 as well. >>>>> http://old.nabble.com/file/p29401692/pkgconfig.diff pkgconfig.diff >>>> >>>> Hm, does not fail for me, so not yet applied, Aldas? >>> >>> Patch is fine but little bit concerned about implementation. Anyway, >>> I'd say we should revert autoconf back to 2.65 and save on pills from >>> headache. René? >>> 95% sure I will do this for 8.0 only I want to see how my clean build goes. >> >> Ok, then apply this as part of your automake review & testing. If you decide >> to >> apply it maybe make it a regular patch and remove the code that applies >> it conditionally. > > It's your call René, I don't have time for trunk atm :/ > So far 2.66+fix looks fine. My build goes _very_ slowly as it stops on > every single crash on ref. Will start pushing commits later. The question is if the auto* inventors consider this "new feature" and -EWONTFIX, then we could keep it and continue fixing the individual packages, or if they will revert it in the next version, anyway, ... In that case tweaking many packages is wasted time. Anyone dare to find out? René -- René Rebe, ExactCODE GmbH, Jaegerstr. 67, DE-10117 Berlin ttp://exactcode.com | http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.de
----------------------------------------------------------- If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to [email protected] with a subject of: unsubscribe t2
