________
Build-System :
t2-9.0-r43749-minimal-x86-64-mmx_cd1 on real hardware
Changes:
1. echo '' > /etc/profile.d/python
2. scripts/Emerge-Pkg -deps=none lzma xz # Thx to Rene :-)
________
For "default x86_64_minimal" : no problem (expect btrfs in stage >= 5)
For "default x86_64_x32_minimal" :
There was a message for glibc, that a cross-patch-file could not be found,
but it builds.
stage 1: Building base/embutils [0.19 9.0-svn](expect btrfs)
-> Preparing conf. to build this package with dietlibc (statically).
-> Using default dietlibs options!
....
!> x86_64-t2-linux-gnux32-strip -x -R .comment -R .note bin/install.o
!> x86_64-t2-linux-gnux32-strip -x -R .comment -R .note bin/dd.o
!> x86_64-t2-linux-gnux32-strip -x -R .comment -R .note bin/test.o
!> x86_64-t2-linux-gnux32-strip -x -R .comment -R .note bin/ls.o
!> rm ....
In the ERROR-LOG are warnings about : "implicit declaration of functions"
the functions are:
sendfile, wait, rename, fmt_ulong, fmt_ulongpadright,
write1_char, isdigit, fmt_long, puts, exit, alloca, dirfd, mount
I hope I could help.
I'm to unexperienced and to busy to track down the problem at the time.
Good Luck
Dan
By the way:
For "default x86_64_minimal_CROSS" the build crashes for syslinux (stage 0 or
1, i can't remember) with
"
In file included from main.c:52:0:
xfs_sb.h:28:23: fatal error: uuid/uuid.h: No such file or_directory
compilation terminated.
"
At Sun, 17 Jan 2016 17:05:25 +0800,
Barry Kauler wrote:
>
> > could be bash related, I remember 4.3 has some really strange broken
> > variabel substitution bugs. We already worked around some of this in trunk,
> > but I never felt like updating to this strangle clobbered bash version ,…
> >
>
> I installed bash 4.2.53, compiled in T2, then started rev. 44630 from
> scratch, x86_64 generic desktop build.
>
> It required the fixes for 'ppl' and 'glib' in stage-0, that I have
> already posted about.
>
> Then in stage-1 it failed at 'dieltlibc'.
>
> Identical build to before, but this time has failed earlier in stage-1!
>
> So, it seems that I was better off with the bash 4.3.0 from Ubuntu 15.10.
>
> I'll give it a go without the "x32", just plain x86_64, see how far it gets .
>
> Regards,
> Barry
>
-----------------------------------------------------------
If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
[email protected] with a subject of: unsubscribe t2
