On 01/05/2010 03:05 PM, Roy Wallace wrote: > On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 3:34 AM, Alex Mauer > <hawke-jojdulvogomqvbxzion...@public.gmane.org> wrote: >> >>> My point is: There is an important difference between >>> - a real, official cycleway (prohibited by law for others) >>> - some way that looks like it was pretty much suitable for cycling > ... >> >> I would suggest that the difference between tagging for your two >> examples is most likely legal, and therefore: >> highway=path+access=no+bicycle=designated for the former and >> highway=path+bicycle=yes for the latter. > > Close - but bicycle=yes just means bicycles are legal > (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Access). For "suitability" > (whatever that means), I'd suggest bicycle=yes + bicycle:suitable=yes.
In point of fact I would do neither, because I don’t see the need to point out particularly suitable biking routes that aren’t officially designated bike routes. Any way of doing so would be far too subjective for my tastes. But if I really felt a strong need to apply a tag for some reason, it would be bicycle=yes. -Alex Mauer “hawke”
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
