On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 6:27 AM, Roy Wallace <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Richard Welty <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > a tree may be in a parking area, but how exactly do you propose to park > on it? > > The more important question is "what does amenity=parking apply to?" > a) a parking area, or b) a place you can park. I prefer a), because > otherwise many, many flat surfaces near roads would be > amenity=parking. In which case you don't need the "inner" polygons > because a tree can be *in* an amenity=parking. > I go with the a) interpretation. amenity=parking is basically a piece of land/space set aside for parking purposes. Not all nooks and crannies of that piece of land/space is actually where a car can drive/park on.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
