2010/1/30 Roy Wallace <waldo000...@gmail.com>: > On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Richard Welty <rwe...@averillpark.net> wrote: >> >> a tree may be in a parking area, but how exactly do you propose to park on >> it? > > The more important question is "what does amenity=parking apply to?" > a) a parking area, or b) a place you can park. I prefer a), because > otherwise many, many flat surfaces near roads would be > amenity=parking. In which case you don't need the "inner" polygons > because a tree can be *in* an amenity=parking.
it is not about "needing" the inner polygons, they describe the situation better and enter more detail - regardless of case a) or b). cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
