Does anyone see a problem with simply using the same admin_level tag currently in use with boundary=administrative, in combination with aeroway=aerodrome? A new aerodrome_importance tag could be created, but admin_level is already in use so why not make it multi-purpose. All we'd have to do is come up with the appropriate zoom levels for each admin_level, request that this combination be added to the Mapnik stylesheet, and then we'd need a chart on the wiki similar to the admin_level chart for boundaries to be filled in by mappers in each country. Seems reasonable to me….
Zeke On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:19 AM, John Smith <[email protected]>wrote: > On 16 June 2010 14:05, Steve Bennett <[email protected]> wrote: > > Absolutely. I think it's important to have clear definitions like > > "importance 3 is given to airports with X runways" *within* geographic > > regions (countries?), but not *across* them. This can be managed > > effectively through wiki pages for each country, describing the local > > rules, like > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines > > Actually this would be a better list to base things on: > > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative#10_admin_level_values_for_specific_countries > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
