2010/9/7 NopMap <[email protected]>: > I dont't think so. Considering that 75% of the trees are from only 3 users, > they could be quickly fixed.
IMHO tagging ordinary trees as "non-significant _or_ not lone" (which is the wiki definition) is an absurdity. If we cannot agree on tagging special trees in a special way but the opposite this topic will continue to annoy and you will have continuously to complain about trees tagged the wrong way... cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
