Andreas Labres wrote:
>
> I don't see the problem why one could not tag every tree as "this is a
> tree" and
> additionally tag some of these as "this one is special, some kind of
> landmark or
> something". (We have some "Bildbäume" here that could be tagged
> additionally.)
>
> And the Garmins and others would probably only import these "landmark
> trees",
> ignoring all the others...
>
> So where's the problem?
>
Who's going to find, check and re-tag those 58000 trees?
bye
Nop
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/tagging-single-trees-tp5501462p5506813.html
Sent from the Tagging mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
