I have an additional analysis task:
We know how much trees are tagged with, and how much are tagged without
additional tag, but:
1) How much users added trees with additional tags?
2) How much users added trees with additional tags and trees without?
3) How much users added trees without additional tags in a later
changeset then trees with additional tags?
4) How much trees have additional tags describing the importance, where
these are added later by the original contributor of the tree node?
5) same as 4) but with different users
Question 1 would be good to compare against the users who never used the
more precise tags
Question 2 could show users using natural=tree with knowledge about the
additional tags - so probably aware of the additional tags
Question 3 goes into the same direction as Question 2
Question 4 should point out specializations made later
Question 5 could probably show, that adding simply a tree by one user
motivates other people to add more data.
regards
Peter
On 07.09.2010 17:24, NopMap wrote:
John F. Eldredge wrote:
It seems reasonable to me that a node simply tagged as a tree, with no
other information, could be single or not-single, a landmark or not a
landmark.
Again. We are not freely discussing a model to implement in the future. We
have a lot of work already done. And if there is a definition for a tag,
undisputed and unchanged for 4 years, and people use the tag in a fitting
manner, isn't it the most sensible thing to assume that they actually knew
what they were doing and meant exactly what the definition says?
John F. Eldredge wrote:
From here on, in other mails, you use the German numbers as if they're
the only numbers.
They are the only numbers I have. Do you have more?
John F. Eldredge wrote:
It doesn't seem anyone's mind is being changed at this point, so I'd
like to second Martin's suggestion that we move to the voting phase.
The statistics indicate that between 76% (German evaluation by myself) and
87% (global evaluation by Fabian Schmid) of the users who entered/touched a
node used it according to the current definition in the wiki. It does not
make sense to vote on any change if the actual use confirms the existing
state with a vast majority while the masses of nonconformant nodes come from
only a very small number of users.
bye
Nop
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
