John F. Eldredge wrote: > He noted earlier in the thread that the bot is tagging any tree that is > within 50 meters of another tree as denotation=cluster. > The wiki says to use this notation for trees that are not single trees, but > does not specify what distance distinguishes a single tree from a cluster of > trees.
The wiki only says this since Nop added that tag to the "Tag:natural=tree" page today.[1] >From the information available to me, it seems as if the tag was invented and mass tagged (using a script) by the same person, in the same day, without even an attempt to reach consensus that this mass edit should be performed. For the record, I think that the denotation=cluster tag is a bad idea. It's vague, overlaps with the other values of denotation and doesn't add any information that wasn't there before. Tobias Knerr [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=DE%3ATag%3Anatural%3Dtree&action=historysubmit&diff=530483&oldid=529909 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag%3Anatural%3Dtree&action=historysubmit&diff=530482&oldid=528386 _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
