On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Nathan Edgars II <[email protected]> wrote: > Luckily you're not the final judge of what's appropriate.
In this case that's actually unfortunate. On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Nathan Edgars II <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Anthony <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Nathan Edgars II <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Anthony <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> For a right of way designated in the plats (which, if it's in the >>>> plats it shouldn't be built on, right?), maybe something like >>>> landuse=right_of_way, or landuse=paper_street. >>> >>> That requires drawing it as an area rather than a single line. >> >> No, you can put any tags you want on any elements you want. > > So how would you draw a paper street that forms a circle? I'm not sure that I ever would "draw a paper street". I don't see the point of it (*). But if you're asking how to map a closed way in OSM, and designate that it is not an area (when using a tag which can be used for both areas and non-areas and defaults to area=yes), that would be area=no. (*) Maybe for "a confusing situation where a street appeared on Google Maps, but not on OSM", I might draw the street and not put any tags on it except maybe "note=appears in Google Maps but doesn't actually exist". Though even then, probably not, because someone might claim that infringes on the Google Maps TOS. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
