On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Alex Mauer <[email protected]> wrote: > On 10/19/2010 11:02 AM, Anthony wrote: >> >> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Nathan Edgars II<[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> We do have highway=proposed/construction. >> >> Most of which I assume would be usable for travel, at least by >> construction vehicles. If highway=proposed is being used for >> something which is completely invisible, I think that's inappropriate. > > How so?
It's not a highway. > Of course, at some point a proposal may die and there’s no need to indicate > on the map where a road is *no longer* proposed. Following the concept of highway=proposed, maybe you could do highway=proposed, proposed=no_longer.</sarcasm> _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
