2010/11/7 Sam Vekemans <[email protected]>: > Hi, > Adding 'culture=community_center' and culture=community_centre' would > helpfull. > > > although there needs to be a clear difference from 'tourism' key.
I think the current definition of tourism is not too bad: "Places and things of specific interest to tourists: places to see, places to stay, things and places providing support." I'd adjust the definition to reality: "Places and things provided mainly or exclusively for tourists and visitors". Places to stay have never been part of "tourism" in OSM, "things of specific interest" might be OK, but might be of "specific interests to locals" as well. "places to see" is also not the point of a definition IMHO. It is OK for tourism=attraction (which itself might merit a subtag to get a finer graduation of hierarchy, say 3 levels) to flag otherwise already described elements. E.g. a fountain, a church, an opera, a museum, a lake, a waterfall, a statue, a square, ... But besides an "interesting for tourists"-flag I don't see a point in putting any of these in tourism. > perhaps 'tourism' is reserved for things that are designed primarly > for the benifit of visitors to the area, were 'culture' is more for > locals 'cultural activities/things/places. I don't think "culture" has to be reduced according to an expected or supposed audience. It would not really help IMHO. I'm fine with your tourism-definition. cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
