2010/11/7 Tom Chance <t...@acrewoods.net>: > On 7 November 2010 18:34, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> > wrote: > Ah, Wikipedia, that well known internationally agreed source of definitions > for words ;-) I forgot that we need to slavishly follow anything we spot in > Wikipedia or that other well-worn blind alley one's online dictionary of > choice.
Well, what is your definition of museum? I don't have to follow slavishly wikipedia but I took this as a first indication. > As I wrote on the wiki, we have separate amenity values for bar, pub and > nightclub instead of amenity=drinking_establishment; maybe that was already an error we shoudn't repeat? > There is no rule that says, because art > galleries are often considered a sort of museum, we must relegate "art > gallery" to a sub-type of culture=museum. I know, but I'd recommend it for now as it seems logical to me. I'm not insisting on this, but there surely are other subtypes of museums. > There is no problem with culture=museum, and since a great many art > galleries don't describe themselves as museums it would be worse to make > everyone use culture=museum plus some sub-tags. hm, there is also museums for art that don't describe themselves as art_galleries. Do you really suggest to separate them into different tags according to their name or description? cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
