On 29 January 2011 22:33, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]> wrote: > 2011/1/29 John Smith <[email protected]>: >> On 28 January 2011 21:35, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Yes, IMHO (I'm not an English native) this is not scree. I would tag them >>> landcover=bare_rock (or depending on the size landcover=pebbles) >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Wave_Retreating_from_Pebbles.jpg >> >> Why bother with landcover=* when we have natural=* and surface=* already? > > > why explain the same issues a hundred times? You can find the answer > in the ML archive and in the wiki.
and just like previous threads I'm still to be convinced we need landcover=*, I just don't see the point of introducing a 3rd type that only serves to confuse things. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
