2011/1/29 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]>: > 2011/1/29 John Smith <[email protected]>: >> That definition hasn't been true since use of surface=* was expanded >> beyond highways > > > can you point me to this decision? In my mapping I almost never see > surface used for something different than highways. If you look at > the actual values you can see that they are nearly completely > highway-values:
also from a data consuming e.g. rendering point of view I see more disadvantage then advantage to not separate landcover as a feature from surface as an attribute to highways. cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
