2011/1/29 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]>: > I could > also support surface (there might be space for landcover as well). > Actually surface=sand or bare_rock makes perfectly sense.
even though this creates some problems: if you tag a polygon with natural=beach, surface=sand, doesn't this imply a the polygon is sand? The "beach" could often include also bars, restaurants, parking space, paths and other. surface on a polygon should IMHO imply that this polygon has this surface. In this optic the landcover-values is more generalizing while surface shouldn't. cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
