On 30 January 2011 03:28, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > It is mainly the meaning, surface refers to the surface while > landcover refers to the general coverage. I agree that sand is a good > value for surface, but at the same time there could be > landcover=trees.
Isn't there plenty of other tree options already, why do we need yet another one? _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
