Am 23.05.2011 14:57, schrieb Vincent Pottier: > Le 23/05/2011 14:17, Craig Wallace a écrit : >> On 23/05/2011 12:15, Andrew Chadwick (lists) wrote: >>> I'm suggesting that we remove the language on >>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgarden which recommends >>> leisure=garden for tagging private residential gardens. The talk page >>> entry is at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:leisure%3Dgarden >>> and I welcome your comments! >>> >>> This mini-proposal suggests A) removing the language from the first and >>> second English-language paragraph describing residential gardens, and B) >>> suggesting >>> >>> landuse=residential >>> residential=garden >>> >>> as an alternative tagging scheme. My rationale for doing this: >> >> I agree with all this for not using leisure=garden. >> >> Though I think it would be simpler to just tag them as >> residential=garden, without the landuse tag. >> Usually you would have landuse=residential around the whole area, then >> map individual gardens and houses etc within that. >> >> No need to use two tags when one will say just as much. > Hum ! Interesting. > > I imagine we could map a large area with a landuse=residential, and > inside, in micromapping, polygons with residential=garden. > It would avoid having several polygons ovelapping with landuse tags, or > a multipolygon with thousand inner members producing errors in postGIS > when several inners are juxtaposed. > > So we can easily combine different mapping level. > > Mapnik would give different renderings, with transparency. > > A way that seems good to explore...
+1 at least for many landuses this might work. For farmland this will solve mircomapping of fields and keep the landuse as a bigger area. Even residential=road/street would be possible. Cheers fly _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
