On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Seth Golub <s...@sethoscope.net> wrote:
> It seems that kerb=flush is saying that there is no kerb. kerb=no seems > more intuitive, and probably some people will use it no matter what the wiki > says, so why have flush at all? > Flush kerbs are important to note especially for the blind, as they don't have a sudden or even gradual change in height to let them know they're about to cross a road. "lowered" seems to mean "raised, but not very much". I imagine the intent > was "lowered compared to the otherwise raised sidewalk", but all the other > values are relative to the road. Instead it implies "lower than the road". > Lowered was used in the original proposal, I'd actually prefer the term sloped. I think that makes quite a bit more sense than lowered. Opinions? -Josh
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
