On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 05:32:54 +0100, Josh Doe <j...@joshdoe.com> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Seth Golub <s...@sethoscope.net> wrote: Lowered was used in the original proposal, I'd actually prefer the term sloped. I think that makes quite a bit more sense than lowered. Opinions?
I preferred lowered as slopped doesn't describe which way it slopes, it could actually easily slope up higher than usual. It'd be a crazy thing to do at a crossing - but then I have seen the council do some crazy thing's in the past.
It could also be potentially mistaken for the rolled kerbs. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
