>From a hikers point of view I'd like to see some differentiation of tide affected ways. There's a number of tracks I didn't put on the map because I wasn't sure the tidal info placed in side tags would get to rendered. Use of difficulty scales doesn't quite warn someone either. I know given the current state of the map it can't be relied on for hiking. But one would hope it was heading in that direction. Though I dislike 4 wheel drivers stuffing up the landscape - it exists and it's requirements should be mapped where it is allowed.
Gary P.S. As an australian english speaker 'tidal' works well for me On Nov 25, 2011 9:19 AM, "Nathan Edgars II" <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11/24/2011 5:10 PM, Richard Fairhurst wrote: > >> Dave F. wrote: >> >>> That's not what he said,& you know it. Typical Paul "I ignore >>> facts just so I can start an argument" Johnson. >>> >> >> Traditionally I try to act as an administrator rather than a moderator on >> this list, but I think that oversteps the mark a little, I'm afraid. By >> all >> means disagree on the list, but try not to bring personal character into >> it >> - play the ball, not the man. >> > > The ball is that representing an area (a beach) by a way is stupid, and > Paul's not stupid. > > ______________________________**_________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.**org/listinfo/tagging<http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging> >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
