On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 16:43 +0100, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > 2011/11/23 John F. Eldredge <[email protected]>: > > Stephen Hope <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > What would the correct highway classification be for an Oregon > >> beach? > >> > These fall under the Oregon Department of Transportation's > >> jurisdiction > >> > despite not being improved for vehicular use (and trying will > >> seriously > >> > screw up a bicycle, based on experience). > > > > It sounds like the beach might be classed as a track, in that case. > > > -1, we should not classify every area where vehicles might access as a > way. You can (physically) drive on most meadows and crops, but that > doesn't make them a track. He explicitly stated: "despite not being > improved for vehicular use"
Well, if we're going to exclude ways from being ways because they're not improved for vehicular use, then i have a lot of cattle trails I need to remove (despite being named, with addresses along them, open to vehicles and accessible by 4x4).
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
