Probably better to introduce a new value to mean yes-they-really-are-cobbles. Perhaps "cobbles" (as opposed to cobblestone)
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Tobias Knerr <[email protected]> wrote: > Jonathan Bennett wrote: > > In summary: I believe the three classes to be separate and > > non-overlapping. So I disagree with the wiki edit made, but do think > > surface=sett is a sensible, verifiable tag. > > A "sett" (a word I've never heard before) is apparently colloquially > called "cobblestone". To the extent that even the image in the Wikipedia > article about "sett" is called "Cobblestones_01.jpg". > > We cannot just introduce a new surface value "sett": That would change the > definition of surface=cobblestone to no longer include sett surfaces. But > almost all surface=cobblestone currently in the database have actually a > "sett" surface, and according to the wiki documentation until now, this was > the expected way to tag them - it was using a sett surface as an > illustration for the meaning of surface=cobblestone. > > Tobias > > > ______________________________**_________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.**org/listinfo/tagging<http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging> >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
