On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 5:28 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]> wrote: > not so sure about this. Currently there is really a lot of values in > surface but (as far as I know) none of them gets subtagged. Instead of > subtagging we could also keep cobblestone for "sett" and invent > another value for old cobblestones, could be something dumb like > real_cobblestone, real_cobbles, round_cobbles, round_cobblestone, > old_cobblestone or similar. We would subsequently change the tags for > the (probably few) surface=cobblestone which are actually old_cobbles > and done.
Ok - I guess I'm wary of there being so many surface values, but that does seem to be the practice. (How does any data reuser cope with so many?) Possible values: surface=historic_cobblestone surface=preserved_cobblestone surface=rounded_cobblestone Steve _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
