Steve Bennett wrote: > So, whoever really wants to introduce this distinction is going to > have to find another way, perhaps "surface=cobblestone, > cobblestone=sett".
Thank you for dealing with the issue. Subtagging seems like a good suggestion for making this distinction. We would also need a value for "real" cobblestone, though, not just sett. After all, it's much more likely that the subtag will be used on the small number of non-sett surfaces. Of course, cobblestone=cobblestone seems a bit silly. Maybe cobblestone=cobbles/sett? Any other suggestions? There also is a rarely used surface=cobblestone:flattened tag documented in the Map Features template. This should probably also be turned into a subtag value, _if_ it is actually a variant of its own and not just referring to setts. Tobias _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
