On 13.06.2012 15:07, Martin Vonwald wrote: > 2012/6/13 Eckhart Wörner <ewoer...@kde.org>: >> Competing proposals: >> * >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/access_restrictions_1.5 >> - in my opinion a horrible and incomprehensible syntax with arbitrary >> distinctions, taginfo revealed almost no uses (for example, >> "maxspeed:hgv:wet" in the Extended Conditions proposal above is >> "access:lgv?wet.speed" in the Access Restrictions 1.5 proposal) > > In my opinion the 1.5 proposal is not that horrible. The syntax is > quite complicated so that no mere mortal will ever understand it and > we would need quite some editor support there. But is also seems to be > more flexible and powerful.
Can you give a concrete example where it is actually more powerful? Something that can be expressed with "restrictions 1.5", but not with the "extended conditions" syntax? (Yes, it lists "more of the same" - more vehicle types, more groups of users, more weather conditions and so on. But that's not what I mean. These things don't have anything to do with the syntax.) > However your example "access:lgv?wet.speed" is a good one against the > 1.5 proposal. But why not combine those proposals? This would result > in "maxspeed:hgv?wet". I read this as "the MAXSPEED for HGV IF (the > question mark) weather is WET is ...". Sound reasonable to me. More reasonable than "access:lgv?wet.speed", yes. But how is it easier than "maxspeed:hgv:wet"? Tobias _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
