Hi Ronnie, Am Freitag, 21. September 2012, 16:30:42 schrieb Ronnie Soak: > I've done your exercise and I did see your point: It is easier to ADD > an additional restriction to an existing one with the EC scheme than > with the CR scheme, because you simply add a new key instead of > modifying an existing one.
there are more traps in that example. :-) > Did you want me to upload the result somewhere? If you want to, yeah. > How far did you get with the EC examples on the CR talk page? > I wasn't able to complete them as already at example #2 I felt the > need to specify a COMBINATION of two conditions, which I found no > solution for at the EC proposal. You are talking about the equivalent of taxi:conditional=no @ (occupants>8 AND 18:00-10:00) In Extended Condition tagging, this will become: taxi:(occupants>8):(18:00-10:00)=no Eckhart _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
