Hi again, > > there are more traps in that example. :-) > Traps? I've found a stray CR tag in the EC file, which I silently corrected. And one part of the way was tagged 120@wet even though it was probably meant as without restriction, which I now also changed to be symmetrical to the other side. What else do you mean?
>> Did you want me to upload the result somewhere? > > If you want to, yeah. https://chaos.binaervarianz.de/wp-content/extras/conditional-restrictions.osm https://chaos.binaervarianz.de/wp-content/extras/extended-conditions.osm Sorry, both files are heavily altered by JOSM. > >> How far did you get with the EC examples on the CR talk page? >> I wasn't able to complete them as already at example #2 I felt the >> need to specify a COMBINATION of two conditions, which I found no >> solution for at the EC proposal. > > You are talking about the equivalent of > taxi:conditional=no @ (occupants>8 AND 18:00-10:00) > In Extended Condition tagging, this will become: > taxi:(occupants>8):(18:00-10:00)=no Oh, ok. I didn't know that. Taking another look at the EC page actually reveals a similar case in the examples. But an explicit note would be not a bad idea. For the moment, it is not defined that multiple conditions are (or should) implicitly combined with an AND operation. Regards, Chaos _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
