2012/10/29 Ole Nielsen <[email protected]>: > Here is a simple proposal that avoids confusion with the existing access > restrictions. > > special_use_lanes = no | no | hgv > > (or "special_use:lanes = .." to be consistent with other lanes tags) > > Values can be 'no' (no special limitations apply to this lane), 'hgv', > 'psv', 'hov' etc. > > "special_use_lanes" is just a suggestion, other words not making an > association to "access" could also be used. Other ideas: "special_lanes", > "exclusive_use_lanes" > > Would this be a useful way forward?
I thought about that also but I'm not sure if I want to go down that road. Any new key raises the (already present) risk of being inconsistent. Just imagine hgv:lanes=yes|no and special_use:lanes=no|hgv on the same way. I'm not sure if there's a simple solution to this problem. Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
