I believe there is a solution, which is consistent to current tagging styles and which complies to the Keep It Simple & Smart principle.
In the situation of a motorway with three lanes, of which the rightmost lane is forbidden for motorvehicles (and PSV and HGV can use all three lanes) the tagging would be: motor_vehicle:lanes=yes|yes|no No other access=*, hgv=* or psv=* tag needed in this situation. Cheers, Johan 2012/10/30 Martin Vonwald <[email protected]> > 2012/10/29 Ole Nielsen <[email protected]>: > > Here is a simple proposal that avoids confusion with the existing access > > restrictions. > > > > special_use_lanes = no | no | hgv > > > > (or "special_use:lanes = .." to be consistent with other lanes tags) > > > > Values can be 'no' (no special limitations apply to this lane), 'hgv', > > 'psv', 'hov' etc. > > > > "special_use_lanes" is just a suggestion, other words not making an > > association to "access" could also be used. Other ideas: "special_lanes", > > "exclusive_use_lanes" > > > > Would this be a useful way forward? > > I thought about that also but I'm not sure if I want to go down that > road. Any new key raises the (already present) risk of being > inconsistent. Just imagine hgv:lanes=yes|no and > special_use:lanes=no|hgv on the same way. > > I'm not sure if there's a simple solution to this problem. > > Martin > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
