On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Malcolm Herring <[email protected]> wrote:
> This is additional information, not duplicate information, so they may well > co-exist with the conventional OSM tags for whatever type of map feature the > object is. If you call: "landuse=cemetery" + "landmark=cemetery" + "seamark=landmark" + "seamark:type=landmark" + "seamark:landmark:category = cemetery" not duplicates, I don't know what you need more for duplicates ;-) As I said, a simple landmark tag is enough. It does not need to specifiy again it is a cemetery when we can combine it with already existing OSM tags (like the "landuse=cemetery"). The tag can be "seamark = landmark" or "seamark:type=landmark", I don't care. But only one single key/value pair providing this information is enough. If nobody is interested by the subject, I will decide myself to deprecate one of them in the wiki, e.g. the "seamark:type=landmark". Although it is the most widely used, it sounds over complicated when we have a simpler version like "seamark=landmark". (and of course, deprecate all "semark:landmark:category=*"). Pieren _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
