Martin Vonwald <[email protected]> wrote: > I just want to add my understanding of the building tags: > > building=xxx (with no other tags like building:use): it looks like a > xxx and is used as xxx > building:use=xxx: it is used as xxx, but might not look like one > building:type=xxx: it looks like xxx, but might not be used as xxx > > So building=hangar to me is a building that was built as a hanger, > therefore looks like one and is used as one. If I now add > building:use=warehouse, it still looks like a hangar but is not used > as such but instead as a warehouse. > > Right/wrong/both of it? > > regards, > Martin > > 2013/1/23 Ronnie Soak <[email protected]>: > > > >> > >> > >> +1, generally building typologies (that's what the value of > building > >> is about) are not refering to the actual usage but to the type of > >> building (e.g. a defiled church building which is now used as a > disco > >> would remain building=church without being an > >> amenity=place_of_worship). > >> > > +1 > > And this is also (maybe) the difference between building=hangar and > > aeroway=hangar > > The first should be building type, the second usage. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Tagging mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Sounds good to me. -- John F. Eldredge -- [email protected] "Reserve your right to think, for even to think wrongly is better than not to think at all." -- Hypatia of Alexandria _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
