On 09/02/2013 10:00, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2013/2/9 Dave F. <[email protected]>:
I'm not interest in this as:
1. It's far too detailed. There are much better thing I can spend my time
mapping.
2. It's too variable. The different seasons, whether the farmer has gone
down the lane with his hedge trimmer etc.etc.
If you are not going to tag this because you think it is too detailed
and the tag is not suitable for your area (because of seasonal
changes) you won't be much help in finding a solution.
What's wrong with the status quo as a solution?
There are some
mappers who do want to tag it, and as long as their way of tagging is
compatible with the rest of the tagging scheme (i.e. they use subtags
rather than more differentiated values for the main key) there is
really no problem if they do it.
I absolutely agree with you. You seem to think I was suggesting
otherwise. As you can clearly see, I didn't.
there are obstacles (vegetation) that don't
change their obstacle effect a lot with the seasons
Vegetation still grows over the course of a year.
I also think that this tag is quite detailed, but I won't hinder or
discourage anybody from adding this level of detail if he wants to.
And neither would I. I need to point out the OP asked for opinions. I
gave mine.
Cheers
Dave F.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
