Hola, estas un vecino, vivo en Toulouse ! Discúlpame, solo entiendo el español, no entiendo el catalan.
More generally, I think there is a problem with path tagging, and we must work about new propositions before voting anything. The actual set of tags does not adequately describe paths. * A proposition for markup. I think something like markup=yes/no markup:quality=excellent/good/... markup:type=paint/cain/... * There is a proposition for obstacle http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Obstacle * A proposition introducing new values for width tag. width=1 poeple width=2 poeple (when 2 persons can walk side by side) width= >2 poeple * A proposition for a new extended scale for sac_scale tag : The actual scale is only relevant for mountain hiking trail. * A new proposition for smoothness : Current definitions are not relevant for paths. Currently it is for "Provide a classification scheme regarding the physical usability of a way for WHEELED VEHICLES" Or a path is a way where WHEELED VEHICLES can't go !!! It must be adapted, by a new scale ? But I disagree about subjectivity. I think it is also informative. The aim of OSM is that every one map the places he know. The judgement he can made about the signifiance of a path is as important as purely physical characteristic. Balaitous _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
