> Also, the proposed path types would classify any path that ends in a > cul-de-sac as the least-used and least-maintained category, which isn't > necessarily the case.
When I say "cul-de-sac" I refer to paths that go nowhere, like this : http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/166766130 http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/169660967 At the beginning, there look good, but there are more and more bad, and at the end there simply disappear ! I have corrected : "This path can be end in cul de sac without any POI." _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
