Hi, Thanks to all who responded.
On 2013-08-08 06:40, malenki wrote : > You could map the dam as area with the highway crossing it. Yes, I finally did that. Even if the dam is a mere 6.5 m wide, it makes sense. On 2013-08-08 02:49, Paul Johnson wrote : > I don't see how those tags are mutually exclusive. As for a dam being > a waterway, makes about as much sense as highway=traffic_signals to me. It depends what tags you're speaking of. Doing as said above, I got a "Crossing waterway/highway" (at dam ends) compliment from JOSM. Expecting Osmose soon. Having had them share the same nodes, which I like less because invisible, that would have been "overlap" compliment, even at different layers unless this will be accepted one day. <https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/7788> See what I mean? Cheers, André. > On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 7:13 PM, André Pirard <a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com > <mailto:a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Hi, > > The waterway=dam <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Dam> > definition is all well but it doesn't give a damn about what runs > on top ;-) > Can I have > waterway=dam > highway=* > ? > I feel like Osmose hides nearby ready to jump. > > The actual case I meet is one of a dam incorrectly tagged as a bridge. > And I inherit a menagerie of highway related attributes. > > And, once again, I'm baffled by a dam being a waterway, like a > crossing being a highway and an artificial water reservoir being a > natural. > > Cheers, > > André. > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
