Andreas Labres wrote > On 21.09.13 21:16, Ole Nielsen wrote: >> On 21/09/2013 21:01, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: >>> I continue to oppose the usage of man_made=tower for electricity lattice >>> towers (that what has been power=tower until now and which is 4,8 >>> Million times in use). Why should we change this well established >>> practise, which would require 4,8 Million new additional tags >>> (tower:type=electricity) and which doesn't even help to reduce potential >>> multivalue conflicts? At least I'd use man_made=power_tower or something >>> similar, but IMHO if there are problems with power=tower having other >>> infrastructure on them this should be dealt with in an alternative way >>> possibly keeping power=tower.
+1 And use tower and pole not about the voltage of line but what I see in the reality. -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Power-tower-and-pole-usefulness-tp5778321p5778417.html Sent from the Tagging mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
