Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]> wrote: > 2013/10/14 Richard Mann <[email protected]> > > > bicycle=no on the entry/exit node should suffice for routing > > > > > +1, for routing that should be sufficient, but not for mapping ;-) > If they are explicitly forbidden on all ways it would not be bad to > have it > on all ways as explicit tag (IMHO). > > cheers, > Martin > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
If pushing a bicycle is permitted on most footways, but not all, it would be useful to tag the distinction, so that a rider planning which route to take will know that they can't go through a particular foot-only shortcut by dismounting and pushing the bicycle. This would also allow renderers to distinguish foot-only ways vs. foot and foot-while-pushing-a-bicycle ways. -- John F. Eldredge -- [email protected] "Darkness cannot drive out darkness: only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate: only love can do that." Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
